Dit artikel is geschreven in het Engels en is nog niet vertaald naar het Nederlands.

Laws of UX and Legal Design: Serial Position Effect

Discover the impact of the Serial Position Effect on user experience and legal design. Learn how strategically placing information in contracts improves recall and enhances the overall experience.

3 min read
Laws of UX and Legal Design: Serial Position Effect
Dielis Delen

Dielis is medeoprichter van Patroon. Hij ontwikkelt gebruiksvriendelijke design systemen om advocaten in staat te stellen legal design toe te passen in hun dagelijkse praktijk. Maakt animaties en video's.

Laws of UX and Legal Design: Serial Position Effect

Welcome to the second episode of our Laws of UX series. This article will examine the Serial Position Effect and its relation to legal design.

Definition

People tend to remember the first and last clauses in a contract best.

Origin

The serial position effect, a term coined by Herman Ebbinghaus, describes how the position of an item in a sequence affects recall accuracy. The two concepts involved, the primacy effect and the recency effect, explain how items presented at the beginning of a sequence and the end of a sequence are recalled with greater accuracy than items in the middle of a list.

Manipulation of the serial position effect to create better user experiences is reflected in many popular designs by successful companies like Apple, Electronic Arts, and Nike.

Primacy and Recency Effects

This graph illustrates the tendency of a user to recall better information from the beginning and end of a list or sequence. The middle things are the most difficult to remember. Keep this in mind when you design your contract. ©Patroon.nl

There are some takeaways from the serial position effect. We can think about these takeaways and find a way to apply them to legal design.

Contract, provisions and call to actions must be in sequence to represent information logically.

  • Limit the amount of recall required if it’s possible. There are always some things that don’t need constant recall. Placing the least essential information in the middle of the contract can be helpful because this information tends to be stored less frequently in long-term and working memory.
  • Positioning critical actions on the far left and right within elements can increase memorization.
  • Mistakenly putting these pieces of information at the start and the end of the contract might make users feel it is essential to remember and causes them to try to fill their heads with somewhat useless information (at least information that doesn’t require constant recall).

Applying memorization techniques to employment contracts

Let’s have a look at how we can apply these ideas to legal practice.

Memorization techniques applied to employment contracts

Conclusion

Don’t forget to reduce the strain on your client by understanding their short-term memory capacity. Put only relevant information in your contract, which has to be remembered at the beginning and the end of the contract.

Here's how using visuals in litigation simplifies complex cases
Here's how using visuals in litigation simplifies complex cases

In this blog post, we will explore the impact of litigation visuals and provide insights into their effectiveness. Then we'll talk about the practical side of using visuals in litigation.

Read more
The Power of Similarity: Enhancing UX and Legal Design with the Law of Similarity
The Power of Similarity: Enhancing UX and Legal Design with the Law of Similarity

Discover how the Law of Similarity improves the user experience. Learn how using color, shapes, and sizes creates a cohesive visual experience and prevent users from overlooking important information in contracts.

Read more
Tesler's Law: Understanding the Laws of UX and Legal Design
Tesler's Law: Understanding the Laws of UX and Legal Design

Explore Tesler's Law and its impact on legal design in this insightful article. Learn how complexity and simplicity intersect in user experience and contract design

Read more